RE: Dynamic or Static routing
Thanks you all for the answers!!!
PD: These answers are not for me, but for my boss!!
De: Andrew Miehs [mailto:email@example.com]
Enviado el: Lunes, 06 de Febrero de 2006 08:12 p.m.
Para: Léo Goehrs
CC: Pablo; Debian-ISP List
Asunto: Re: Dynamic or Static routing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
If you need to ask these questions then static routing is more than
You need dynamic routing where you have multiple paths through your
IE: Load balancing/ Fail-over lines inside your network. (Although
use metrics and static routes here if it is a very simple network).
RIP is NEVER a solution for a service provider. OSPF and IS-IS are two
of the most used solutions, although I do know of one instance where
provider ran there customer routes through iBGP.
These requirements also change on whether you want to run MPLS in
My recommendation - if you have a simple network, keep it simple by
On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Léo Goehrs wrote:
> Static routes is definitely a bad idea, in medium to large
> nerworks, prefer OSPF☺
> Leo Goehrs
> Do anyone use or have a complete static-routing based
> network for customers (Cable Modem, DSL, dial-up, etc.) and/or
> backbone? Why static routing could be better than dynamic routing
> (RIPv2 or OSPF)?
> Thanks in advance.
> Saludos. Pablo.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----