Re: suggested virus scanner for postfix (?)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Eric Cunningham wrote:
> I can't speak for it's speed (only 20 users here) but I would think the
> actual virus scan would be a greater bottleneck then the interface to
> the mta, right?
Spamassassin eats a lot more wall-time than anything else in a typical
amavisd-new setup.
Also, see backports.org for backported amavisd-new 2.3.3 packages. Etch and
sid also have 2.3.3 packaged.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: