[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: blacklists



On Wednesday 08 December 2004 09:55, Michael Loftis <mloftis@modwest.com> 
wrote:
> I have to agree with that statement.  For us it suits our needs very well.
> I don't mind handling the extra retry traffic if it means legitimate mail
> on a 'grey/pink' host is just temporarily rejected or delayed while they
> clean up, in fact this is far more desireable for us.  Complaints of 'lost'
> mail went up when we were using permanent fatal codes as an experiment.
> Yes legitimate hosts get blacklisted, but legitimate hosts will retry, and
> if they don't well, it's their problem, not ours.  We're telling them 454
> listed on spamciop see URL of whatever (I'm obviously paraphrasing)

How would I configure Postfix to do this?

Craig, why do you think it's undesirable to do so?

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page



Reply to: