also sprach Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> [2004.10.29.1508 +0200]: > It assumes that all DNS servers use the same configuration format, > or that all DNS servers in a given zone run the same software, > which simply is an incorrect assumption. It has suited me just fine. I am thankful that djbdns provides me with a strong basis upon which I can converge. axfrdns additionally offers zone transfers to AXFR servers, and scripts exist to convert AXFR transfers to djbdns format. If you've ever seen the djbdns config file format, you aren't going back. Or are you going to argue that BIND zone files are intuitive, not error-prone, and easy to manage? > Using BIND9, nsupdate, and domain keys, you have an IXFR > implementation that is complete, secure (at least as secure as > BIND itself and the key you're using), and that works: My last status was that the encryption used was not much better than MIME64. I may well be wrong. > Yes, obviously this requires you to do some configuration first. > So what? Well, I have better things to do. No, I don't want a flame war, so please don't reply. You use BIND, I used djbdns, makes two happy people. In any case, please don't advocate to run BIND to everyone. Too much can go wrong. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature