also sprach Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.10.29.1112 +0200]: > How is djbdns good? In that it doesn't correctly implement the > RFCs on some crucial parts of the DNS protocol? > > (hint: search for 'AXFR' or 'IXFR', and see what mr. Bernstein has > to say about that. No, rsync is /not/ a suitable protocol to > synchronise DNS configuration!) Neither AXFR nor IXFR are crucial, and instead of your proof by assertion, would you care to tell me why rsync is not suitable? It works far better here. Anyway, with the confidence that boldly jumps out of your post, I am sure you know about axfrdns, which is part of djbdns. That provides AXFR but not IXFR. I have yet to see an implementation of IXFR that works. If you now way BIND, I am just going to laugh at you. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature