[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Recommendations for redundant server esp. regarding shared storage?

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:25, Christian Hammers <ch@lathspell.de> wrote:
> Shared storage would be neat as we could do real load balancing on
> POP3/IMAP servers as well but has anybody a recommendation for a

In my experience neither POP3 nor IMAP uses any significant amount of CPU 
time.  Therefore having the files stored on local disks with a single CPU 
running POP/IMAP will be expected to give significantly better performance 
than having two machines running POP/IMAP and mounting the partitions over 

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: