[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

..spammer in edu.uy, was: Problems aplaying mosix patch



On Thu, 27 May 2004 02:46:45 -0300, UnKnown wrote in message 
<20040527054645.GA606@burst.fcien.edu.uy>:

> Hi ppl im installing mosix pathc in kernel 2.4.17, as the docs of
> mosix package ask the kernel-source-2.4.17 was install. Then I move to
> the/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.17 dir and execute
> /usr/src/kernel-patches/i386/apply/mosix
> and get what follows.....
> 
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.17#
> /usr/src/kernel-patches/i386/apply/mosix Testing whether Mosix 1.5.7
> patch for 2.4.17 applies (dry run): 2 out of 18 hunks FAILED -- saving
> rejects to file fs/exec.c.rej 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving
> rejects to file kernel/ptrace.c.rej 2 out of 31 hunks FAILED -- saving
> rejects to file kernel/sys.c.rej 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving
> rejects to file include/asm-i386/processor.h.rej Mosix 1.5.7 patch for
> 2.4.17 does not apply cleanly
> 
> Then obviously the mosix daemon doesnt run :(
> any clue of what could be wrong...

..theeeeeese headers?:  ;-)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
	id 0423AE8BC; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:41:36 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <rak@burst.fcien.edu.uy>
X-Original-To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Received: from burst (burst.fcien.edu.uy [164.73.80.9])
	by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP 
	id 80921E8AD for <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>; 
	Thu, 27 May 2004 00:41:30 -0500 (CDT) 
Received: from rak by burst with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BTDj3-0000A1-00
	for <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 27 May 2004 02:46:45 -0300
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 02:46:45 -0300
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Problems aplaying mosix patch
Message-ID: <20040527054645.GA606@burst.fcien.edu.uy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: UnKnown <rak@burst.fcien.edu.uy>
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-05-26_04
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-05-26_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-lists.debian.org_2004_05_26_03
	(2004-01-11) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER
autolearn=no 	version=2.63-lists.debian.org_2004_05_26_03
X-Spam-Level: 
Resent-Message-ID: <B0I1gB.A.OyG.P-XtAB@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17084
X-Loop: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-isp.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/> 
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 00:41:36 -0500 (CDT)

..it's possibly just me, but I smell spam whenever some UnKnown 
asks some cluster question in d-isp from a box named "burst" off 
a TLD named uy with no whois server up from it.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



Reply to: