On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 19:27, George Georgalis wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 07:01:24PM +0300, kgb wrote: > >On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:58, Michelle Konzack wrote: > >> Hello Russian Secret Service Agent... > >> > >> Am 23:35 2003-07-19 +0300 hat kgb geschrieben: > >> > > >> >Hello, > >> > > >> >Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't like > >> >it anymore because it make my system under high load. > >> > > >> >Thanks in advanced. > >> > >> I think there is no other choice... > >> > >> I use ipac on a 100 MBit LAN where I count the traffic of five > >> 11 MBit WaveLAN-Channels... where ipac has two NIC's and is > >> In-Line between the Main-Router and the Switch where the Lucent > >> ORINOCO COR-1100 and wireless Bridges are connected... > >> > >> Each channel has 120 Clients... > >> > >> I use a AMD Athlon XP 2400+ with 512 MByte of memory and the > >> load is around 17... > >> > >> I have for each client (all fixed IP's) two rules (rx/tx) to the > >> Internet and two rules (rx/tx) to the internal mail-Server. > >> > >> So I have completly 2400 rules plus som special-rules to count > >> ftp, http, shttp and mail traffic. > >> > >> In summary around 2500 rules. > >> > >> What Do you have ??? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Michelle > >> > >I have over 2000 rules "bgpeer tx/rx", "internet tx/rx", "local traffic tx/rx" > >machine is AMD Athlon XP 1700+ with 1G ram i forgot how many rules are > >limit in iptables but when they are so many this is really sucks this is > >on 100Mbit LAN the problem is when fetchipac is running and ipacsum because > >file in /var/lib/ipac-ng/data.db is over 5G when file i smaller traffic is smaller > >or fetchipac and ipacsum is not running everything is fine i think thats can not be > >the only one way... > > > > I don't run it, I'm just a by stander; but I bet you are not dealing > with cpu issues but disk io. run top and compare system load to your cpu > state % idle time. > > If you've got idle cpu, and load over one, you are most likely dealing > with disk speed not cpu.... time for hardware scsi, striped raid, on 15k > rpm disks :-P unfortunatly that's a lot more difficult and expensive > than upgrading cpu and ram :-\ > > // George > > > > -- > GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architect cell: 646-331-2027 <IXOYE>< > Security Services, Web, Mail, mailto:george@galis.org > Multimedia, DB, DNS and Metrics. http://www.galis.org/george Yes, you're right but my question is, is there have other way to do accounting some bash, shell script to fetch traffic with "tc" command from cbq shaper ? -- Feci quod potui, faciant meliora potentes!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part