[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Partitioning a Web Server



Hello Mark, 

Am 02:20 2003-04-03 -0500 hat Mark Bucciarelli geschrieben:
>
>On Wednesday 02 April 2003 10:58 pm, junkyjunk.com wrote:
>
>> 50 domains with web and mail should run you probably around 500
>> megs on a busy mail day. 
>
>hmmm, from the two responses i got, sounds like we could run many more 
>sites on this box.  100?  200?  if disk space and bandwidth is no 
>problem, is file handles the next constraint we would hit?
>
>mark


In Strasbourg I have installed around 380 Domains with 
around 2800virtual Hosts on a Athlon Xp 1600+ with 
512 MByte and an IBM 60 GBytes. 

I have only following Partitions:

hda1    /               200 MB
hda2    swap            200 MB
hda3    /tmp            500 MB
hda5    /usr            400 MB
hda6    /var/log        700 MB      <-- DO THIS !!! Because you can 
                                        run in trouble and LOGS can 
                                        crash the system or make it 
                                        unusable...
hda7    /data           rest
                        ./domain1.tld/mailspool
                                      LOGS
                                      host1
                                      host2
                        ...

It works like the hell and I can give each directory 
/data/domainX.tld a full quota...

Using quota, apache, php4, exim 4.10, qpopper,...

The Server is connected to an 34 MBit backbone and 
handle around 4,3 GByte traffic per day. 

Maybe the 34 is a little bit overkill, but cheeper as 
5 x 2 Mbit. 

And I have noted, that sometimes there are some hours 
NO TRAFFIC and another time 14-25 MBit/second

I hope this Helps

Michelle

-- 
Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michelle's Internet-Service                    Inh.  Michelle Konzack    |
| FunkLAN-Providerin                                                       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+



Reply to: