RE: SCSI or IDE
If you lose the primary boot disk on software raid its not bootable in my
I wouldnt use software raid for any prod box for this reason.
I happen to have 2 x 20g sitting, and since I only need 2 gig ish
From: Russell Coker [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 1:35
To: Jones, Steven; 'Thomas Kirk'
Subject: Re: SCSI or IDE
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:30, Jones, Steven wrote:
> i was actually looking at one of these.
> For my simpler needs, data protection is important but there isnt lots of
> it so 2 x 20 gig disks mirrored is heaps. I would like to keep the uptime
> up, so was thinking of this solution, anybody tried one? Its for my web
> server with all of a 128k connection so sucky performance isnt an issue as
> its bugger all hits.
If you only need RAID-1 then software RAID is probably best. It's cheapest
and provides much better performance than most hardware RAID's. Also if you
only need 20G of storage then you still may want to consider 120G drives,
they are much faster than 20G drives.
> However for another job Im thinking of elsewhere (a 2 node cluster) though
> it would be a disaster. 3meg a sec just wont cut it, i can get 16 meg off
> second hand scsi setup for the same dosh.
You can get 40 meg from a software RAID-1 on IDE drives more easily and
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact