Re: apache broke
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100,
> > Teun Vink <teun@moonblade.net> wrote
> > a message of 39 lines which said:
> >
> > > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major
> >
> > First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Development) and for a
> > reason.
> >
>
> I know that that's why it's called unstable. But that doesn't mean that we
> shouldn't mention that and just wait until the package maintainer fixes
> it.
Both one point :-) Although I understand Stephane, I always thought this was
the way of improving, building etc.etc.etc. Dev-work. And because it's sid
in this case, maybe your better of in the debian's dev. department. I
personaly wouldn't be at ease running a sid production box.
:-)
Cheers,
Reply to: