Re: Spamassasin over RBL, was Re: rblsmtpd -t?]
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:57:54PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> If you're in contact with any senior people at these companies suggest
> to them that they use different mail servers (with different IP
> addresses for outgoing traffic) for different purposes. Then when
> their advertising server is listed as a spam source their corporate
> server will still be usable.
what are you doing, russell? you're giving a free clue to mainsleaze
spammers.
bad!!!
the *only* thing that is going to stop these scum from spamming is if
they realise it will damage their ability to communicate.
> This is a simple chance but can save huge amounts of pain for everyone
> concerned.
unfortunately, pain is a neccessary part of the cure for this disease.
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: