[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LSM or GRSecurity

Sounds like GRSec is the solution then, especially since it seems to
integrate into an existing environment far better than the alternative.

Do you know of any Debian-specific documentation or configuration notes
for your GRSec, so I can read up on the steps necessary or any parameters
that need to be configured, etc.?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Coker" <russell@coker.com.au>
To: "Jason Lim" <maillist@jasonlim.com>; <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: LSM or GRSecurity

> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:59, Jason Lim wrote:
> > So long answer short... go with GRSec, because Russell says so *j/k*
> >
> > So what would really need to be changed/modified to run GRSec on a
> > system running testing distro? Not too much I hope....
> Maybe 2 or 3 sysctl entries, depending on what grsec options you choose.
> you build your kernel in a way that matches your environment then you
> need to install the new kernel.
> It's easy.
> --
> Signatures >4 lines are rude.  If you send email to me or to a mailing
> that I am subscribed to which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end
> then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the
> message (the sig won't be read).
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Reply to: