Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Cc: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Subject: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]
From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:53:30 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011006195330.A23962@perkypants.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011005150905.0019B37DF72@lyta.coker.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 5.0.2.1.0.20011004122556.009ebcf0@pop3.ieg.com.br> <[🔎] 20011005150905.0019B37DF72@lyta.coker.com.au>

<quote who="Russell Coker">

> Anything that can be done by getty, mgetty, radius-client, etc can be done 
> better by Portslave.

Is portslave appropriate for a smaller system, say with only three dial-in
ports? mgetty is not exactly the most polite software to administer, and
there are lots of times I'd like a simple, easy to install, sub-10-port
dial-in system.

Thoughts or pointers?

- Jeff

-- 
             "jwz? no way man, he's my idle" - James Wilkinson

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>

References:
- [no subject]
  - From: Cathedral <cathedral@bigfoot.com>
- portslave
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Hacker Script Attempt
Next by Date: Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]
Previous by thread: portslave
Next by thread: Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread