Re: Sendmail vs. ?
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Nick Jennings wrote:
> This is not true, Exim allows much more flexibility with configuration,
> sendmail cannot handle seperate virtual domains (i.e. email@example.com is
> not the same as firstname.lastname@example.org) which is very usefull when running, for
> instance, web-based email services, and you don't want the usernames
> for it to conflict with your shell accounts on another domain, same server.
Bzzt... What version did you switch from ? This scenario can be
handled by either the virtusertable, or by aliases (Yes, you can do
alias processing on *ANY* mailer, not just local).
I have something like this in my virtusertable - the RHS could also
change the host (not just userid), but I've no need for that:
> > 3) I've heard (no experience) that Postfix is probably the easiest migration
> It seems that you've had little experience with anything but sendmail,
> so you're opinion may be rather biased.
Reread that line again - where did I give an opinion ?
<aj> <Knghtbrd> the increase in tension worldwide (as evidenced by crime
<aj> and whatnot) over that time period looks a lot like Linux
<aj> growth since 1993
<aj> ``Linux linked to worldwide crime epidemic!!''