Re: Bind sanity check
At 02:26 PM 12/6/99 -0400, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
>This part is wrong, I think. It is claiming to be authoritative for
>216.64.109.* which he is not, his ISP is. The entry should not be
It is possible to have his ISP delegate the reverse authority to him. But I
don't think the way he had it setup was a valid construct.
--
__ _____ ____ ____ ____ _____ _ _ ___ ____
| | | \ | \ | \ / | \\ / / \ | \
| | |___/ |__ |___/ | \_/ | | |___/
| | | \ | | \ | | | | | \
|___/__|__ |____/ |___/ | \ | | \___/ | \
_____ ____ __ _____ _ _ _
| \ | \ /\ / | \ / \ |
| | |__ /__\ | |____| |
| | | / \ | | | |
|____/ |___/ \ / | \ / o
Reply to: