Re: Huge Email Service
At 02:39 PM 11/28/99 +0100, WOL - Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote:
>I think we all know, that DNS "load-balancing" doesn't scale too good.
It doesn't have to. For the type of setup he had, adding one R-R entry
doubled his capacity. Three entries tripled it, etc. Assuming he did or
will or would do that. :) Anybody have an idea of the upper limit of R-R
efficacy? CNN has 18 R-R entries and their website seems to work ok. (cnn.com)
--
__ _____ ____ ____ ____ _____ _ _ ___ ____
| | | \ | \ | \ / | \\ / / \ | \
| | |___/ |__ |___/ | \_/ | | |___/
| | | \ | | \ | | | | | \
|___/__|__ |____/ |___/ | \ | | \___/ | \
_____ ____ __ _____ _ _ _
| \ | \ /\ / | \ / \ |
| | |__ /__\ | |____| |
| | | / \ | | | |
|____/ |___/ \ / | \ / o
Reply to: