Re: Is there agreement on ddns (or any such) with autoconfigured hosts?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Singer <elf@buici.com> writes:
Marc> I've read many threads on the DNS including an extended one
Marc> from 1999. As far as I can tell, there doesn't seem to have
Marc> been a consensus about how to handle dynamic updates to DNS
Marc> from autoconfigured hosts. It isn't important to me that I
Marc> have reverse lookups, nor do I even care if I have to use
Marc> stateful configuration. I'm just not seeing all of the
Marc> pieces.
Marc> o Is there a DHCPv6 server running on Debian?
Marc> o Is there a dynamic DNS update mechanism is place for
Marc> stateless-autoconfigured hosts?
I know of no DHCPv6 code for debian, nor any clients.
They exist, but I haven't seen them. I'd run them. I see no way to do
DDNS without state. I also see lots of reasons why I want state in my
address configuration, something which the v6-purists never have
comprehended.
(It's because they mostly build routers and never think about
applications)
I know of no feasible way to do DDNS for stateless-autoconfiguration
hosts.
This is a problem I'd like to solve, so that I can do wavesec.org on
ipv6.
- --
] Michael Richardson Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON | firewalls [
] mcr @ xelerance.com Now doing IPsec training, see |net architect[
] http://www.sandelman.ca/mcr/ www.xelerance.com/training/ |device driver[
] I'm a dad: http://www.sandelman.ca/lrmr/ [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBQsGhMIqHRg3pndX9AQG3gAQAlVe0B26/60MhMEQ5qJsFi8gJMa29XtHT
o7p/un5Izezp8wifU5rbrE/cqLdFyvDVi2ESyxpxr+TE+Hq7l2ohCW+JokSrEvN8
YBRdaMI1iftdtJHO1a0HyixY1qPOvnjh+o5RG/tlaVePHG29dyAaHV4FmkKGdUGs
g7yN9EClutU=
=PV6C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: