On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 15:12 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > They exist, but I haven't seen them. I'd run them. I see no way to do > DDNS without state. I also see lots of reasons why I want state in my > address configuration, something which the v6-purists never have > comprehended. > (It's because they mostly build routers and never think about > applications) Well, you can actually say to some OS's to take the /64 from the RA and append ::42 for instance and use that. One can also script that. On linux just replicate the same IPv6 address as a /128 on all interfaces and bingo it always gets used, because of the rather weak source address selection routines. > I know of no feasible way to do DDNS for stateless-autoconfiguration > hosts. The problem is the key for doing DDNS in the first place :) I once cooked up this which solves the DDNS part: http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/Windows_DynamicDNS_Update.zip Which is the Windows variant for: http://ops.ietf.org/dns/dynupd/secure-ddns-howto.html > This is a problem I'd like to solve, so that I can do wavesec.org on > ipv6. What is the exact problem, as I am missing a large detail of it :) The above skips the DHCP server. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part