Re: Stateful Autocinfiguration (DHCPv6)

To: debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Stateful Autocinfiguration (DHCPv6)
From: Remco van de Meent <remco@vandemeent.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:51:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020807175106.GA26673@frml.snt.utwente.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3D500A44.2010900@fabbione.net>
References: <F158vHpFKAFRr1fPgGx0001f6fe@hotmail.com> <20020729084417.GI15206@wiggy.net> <20020731113200.GA3269@answer.42.it> <20020731120428.GD14451@wiggy.net> <20020731130509.GA4737@answer.42.it> <20020731155031.GM14451@wiggy.net> <20020731193526.GA3148@answer.42.it> <20020731202055.GA25634@chapus.net> <3D48B82D.4070508@fabbione.net> <[🔎] 3D500A44.2010900@fabbione.net>

Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> 
> Ok I think we can forget dhcpv6 for some time. people are ISC didn't
> even bother to answer (even if we were expecting that) but let's always
> keep an eye around...
> 

I think you can be quite sure that a number of prototype
implementations will popup in the near future. Given the progress
within the IETF on this subject, I think it's quite attractive for
student assignments for example.

But I have to agree with you if you're talking about industrial
strength implementations. Or it must be one of the other big vendors.

Remco.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Stateful Autocinfiguration (DHCPv6)
  - From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>

Prev by Date: Re: proftpd
Next by Date: Where's http://people.debian.org/~kitame/ipv6 ipv6 unstable gone
Previous by thread: Re: Stateful Autocinfiguration (DHCPv6)
Next by thread: proftpd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread