[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the openvas-plugins-dfsg package



Christian PERRIER píše v Čt 01. 07. 2010 v 07:15 +0200:
> Quoting Michal Simunek (michal.simunek@gmail.com):
> > #. Type: boolean
> > #. Description
> > #. Type: boolean
> > #. Description
> > #: ../openvas-plugins-dfsg.templates:1001
> > #: ../openvas-plugins-dfsg.templates:2001
> > msgid ""
> > "The package can remove it now or you can select to remove it later on "
> > "manually."
> > 
> > Further to boolean type, I thing better is:
> > 
> > "The package installation can remove it now or you can remove it later "
> > "manually."
> > 
> > Because you can select Yes or No, not Remove it now or Remove it later
> > manually.
> 
> While improving debconf templates is always welcomed, I'm very
> reluctant to do this at the moment I'm proposing a simple NMU to deal
> with pending translation work.
> 
> The formal review process is another process (that takes quite a long
> time) and mixing it with the simple NMu process is likely to lead to
> bad results.
> 
> I'd suggest sending a but report with patch (against the original
> templates, preferrably) including a mention that a translation update
> round is needed if the templates change happens.
> 
> 

OK, done. Bugreport 587782

-- 
Michal Šimůnek


Reply to: