Hello Atsuhito,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:07:56PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:22:33 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Well, somehow you did not copy the previous translations in? At least
> > the German version can be (partially) reused, I belive.
>
> Sorry but I misunderstood your suggestions.
> Now it seems some refinements might be necessary so please
> wait a while.
Ok.
> > Also does the rewrite address #475053 as well? As far as I can see,
> > this version no longer shows the license verbatim, so probably this
> > issue is resolved?
>
> Uum, I'm not sure what is the problem here so I can't say
> if it is resolved or not (it is nice if it is resolved).
On April 10th 2008 you said you were going to ask debian-legal about
this issue so I asked if your rewrite was prompted by that discussion.
From my viewpoint, however, the new version is not problematic in this
regard simply because the license itself is contained in the template
anymore (though I do at present not fully understand how the user
knows about the content of the license).
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature