On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:09:46PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > Goals could be different than 100%. I think that 100% it's only a long term > goal, it's not enough. I think the debconf templates would benefit from a similar division by levels as done now in d-i. Or do we already have this? Level 0: essential packages (packages that exist on any Debian system) Level 1: standard packages (and the most common alternatives by popcon stats, eg. postfix) Level 2: packages that end up on CD1 (GNOME, KDE or Xfce) Level 3: ... Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature