Re: other fallback languages Re: Deactivated languages
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:50:19 +0100
Christian Perrier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Quoting Wouter Verhelst (email@example.com):
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 05:58:52PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > So, well, the fallback language is a possible option in a few cases
> > > such as Northern Sami above....but this is not a definitive solution
> > > for most of the currently incomplete languages ?
> > Why hardcode it?
> Because no-one did yet code another way to do it..:-)
> > "While there is a translation of the installer for this language, it is
> > not complete. If a part of the interface has not been translated into
> > your language, which language would you prefer as a fallback?"
> Well, this is more or less what has been suggested at the beginning of
> this discussion. The tricky point is "how to know that a given
> language is or isn't complete", to avoid asking this question for all
That is easy. The same way you know decide to not include certain
languages because they are not complete enough. At some point before a
release the picture should be clear, right?
So yes, this would be a semi-manual task, but that wouldn't be problem,
or would it?