Lucas answer to my mail. This should be the last one and the thread is now "reconstructed". ----- Forwarded message from Lucas Wall <lwall@debian.org> ----- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:16:19 -0300 From: Lucas Wall <lwall@debian.org> To: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> Cc: thomas.huriaux@gmail.com Subject: Re: Launching a NMU campaign for pending l10n bugs X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 27.2734 ) On 15/09/06 12:56, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Lucas Wall (lwall@debian.org): >> On 15/09/06 02:00, Christian Perrier wrote: >> >>> I presented the procedure we used back in early 2005 and everybody >>> agreed that we can re-use most parts of the process and >>> infrastructure. >>> >>> Do you think that we could wake up things and re-use that >>> infrastructure? If you can't, we will of course setup something else, >>> probably from your scripts....but of course, re-using it would be easier. >>> >>> PS, later: see also Thomas Huriaux recent announcement in -i18n >> Sure, no problem. The scripts would need some adjustments. Is the >> current list the direct output of Thomas' script? Or does it have some >> manual editing? Can the script be used to keep the packages status >> updated? Beyond the package list (and some info focus changes) do you >> think there are other changes needed? >> >> If we iron out the details I'll work on the scripts over the weekend. > > > Actually, let's try to get Thomas answer about all this and be sure > that we're not doing duplicate work. > > Thomas, I suggest we work with Lucas so that he can update his old > scripts to fit our new goal.....and you can adjust your extraciton > scripts so that they keep the list used by Lucas script up-to-date as > long as the work advances. I would just need some kind of file I could parse from a perl script. Ideally I would run a cron on gluck[1] to pull this file from somewhere (with http for example) and update the list with the info. > It would also be nice if we get some progress report at the end of the > campaign...thus following how many packages we've fixed and the > "score" of each. No problem with that. > I suggest we move this to debian-i18n so that discussions are > archived. If you do so, please keep all quotes so that people can have > a reference to originally private discussions. I don't do it now as I > need you, Lucas, to be OK for initially private mails to be quoted > publicly. You can quote me on d-i18n (I'm also subscribed to the list, so you don't need to CC me if you reply there). K.- [1] Currenly the scripts run on my home in gluck. I have absolutely no problem with this, but if you prefere we can move them somewhere else (more public?). Somewhere like haydn.d.o? -- Lucas Wall <kthulhu@kadath.com.ar> .''`. Buenos Aires, Argentina : :ø : Debian GNU/Linux http://www.kadath.com.ar `. `' http://www.debian.org PGP: 1024D/84FB46D6 `- 5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356A http://people.debian.org/~lwall 4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6 mailto:lwall@debian.org ----- End forwarded message ----- --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature