Re: groff vs jgroff (Re: man-db locale support)

[Changwoo Ryu <cwryu@debian.org>]

Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp> writes:

[..snipped..]
> However, in case of groff, it looks like as follows, and we see broken chars...
> 
> 0000000  \n  \n  \n   L   S   (   1   L   )                            
> 0000020                                                                
> *
> 0000060                                                           L   S
> 0000100   (   1   L   )  \n  \n  \n 314  \b 314 276  \b 276 301  \b 301
> 0000120 260  \b 260  \n   
>  (snip)
> 
> Bold characters are represented as
>  [1st byte of char] \b [1st byte of char] [2nd byte of char] \b [2nd byte of char]
> and it's bad way for EUC-JP.

I don't see why it's so bad.  I have no problem to read Korean man
pages like the above one, in hanterm.  Hmm..  It seems that hanterm
does some workaround for this.

-- 
Changwoo RYU