Re: Hurd and the archive
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 16:07:26 +0100, a écrit :
> No, just something that works for the majority of our users. I'm fairly
> sure things like SATA and USB is considered essential.
SATA, yes. USB, less.
> > > > > d) VMWare/VBox etc.
> > > >
> > > > This already works.
> > >
> > > Just tried it with vbox - as soon as I selected 'text install', I got a
> > > "critical error" and the vm stopped.
> >
> > I don't have this issue at all, things just go fine here with both the
> > other/other template and the Linux/Linux template. This message comes
> > from vbox I guess (there is no such message in Mach or the Hurd), so I'd
> > tend to think virtualbox has some issues in your setup.
> >
>
> I installed virtualbox on a standard Wheezy system, with other/other and
> 2G ram.
Same here (3.2.0-4-amd64 kernel, kvm supported by my CPU). No issue.
> > > For something to be accepted in testing, it should be in a releaseable
> > > state.
> >
> > Which we haven't seen very precisely defined still. Or at least we have
> > this criterium:
> >
>
> I'll see if I can be clear: I will not be putting Hurd in testing in the
> next few months.
I'm afraid I'll still not be able to explain people when they ask me why
hurd-i386 is not in testing, except vague reasons.
Samuel
Reply to: