[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package renaming

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:35:43PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> - yes, 486, because we don't actually support 386, and compiling a 686
>   won't bring much performance improvement as is the case with Linux
>   which does assembly optimizations

AFAIK, building for 686 makes gcc reorder the generated code differently
and also lets it put cmov instructions. Isn't it worth the cost of
having several images ?

Richard Braun

Reply to: