Re: Bug#409036: postfix: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

[Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>]

Petr Salinger, le Thu 01 Feb 2007 08:30:52 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, LaMont Jones wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:07:57PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>It incorporates needed changes into debian/patches/30hurd.dpatch
> >>and changes debian/rules to ignore failure of "make tidy".
> >>On GNU/kFreeBSD and GNU/hurd it fails always when the 30hurd.dpatch
> >>is not applied - i.e. also in the initial "clean".
> >
> >Could I get uname -r output for both distros? Upstream would like that
> >prior to including the fix upstream.
> 
> I suppose "-r" is not the wanted switch, all variants for GNU/kFreeBSD
> are in http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/06/msg00005.html
> "uname -r" will currently print "6.2-1-486" or "6.2-1-686" or ...
> 
> Please, could hurd porters send similar output of uname invocation.

youpi@gnubber:~$ uname -s
GNU
youpi@gnubber:~$ uname -n
gnubber
youpi@gnubber:~$ uname -r
0.3
youpi@gnubber:~$ uname -v
GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3
youpi@gnubber:~$ uname -m
i686-AT386
youpi@gnubber:~$ uname -o
GNU

uname -p / -i return unknown.

Samuel