[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FHS compliance

Pierre THIERRY <nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org> writes:

> > What the FHS calls "binaries" are only some executables on the Hurd;
> > we have other executables that don't work like FHS "binaries", gotcha?
> Sincerely, I'm not sure I see why it is needed to make a difference. I
> may ask the question from a different point of view: does it harm to
> respect FHS and put what is in /hurd in /sbin and /usr/sbin?

We are not disrespecting FHS, and yes, it does harm.

Reply to: