Re: HURD kernel change
Where is it happening? The L4-hurd@gnu.org hurd list
is very quiet. All of seven messages last month
(http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2003-07/index.html).
Is there some other place to keep up with
developments in the port to L4?
Michael D. Adams
mdmkolbe@yahoo.com
--- Ciaran O'Riordan <ciaran@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> The big change planned is a port of Hurd from
> gnumach to L4,
> this seems to be a year or three away (but IS
> happening).
>
> There's a moderate change right now from
> gnumach1.3 to
> gnumach2.0 (was called oskit-mach). AFAIK, there
> are a
> few necessary bits of work left on gnumach2.0, the
> CDs
> contain gnumach1.3. I don't know the timescale for
> the
> gnumach2.0 transition but the current CDs (snapshot
> K4)
> are supposedly very good (previous trivial problems
> ironned out)
> (I'm using K3 with no unexpected problems)
>
> Ciaran O'Riordan
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:31:24PM +0100, Mark
> Wilkinson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm interested in writing HURD over the Windows
> partition of my hard-disk :)
> >
> > However, I read on this list that you were
> considering a change of
> > kernel (from Mach to something else if I remember
> correctly), is that
> > still going ahead? If so, are the latest CD
> images using the new kernel
> > code? And if the latest CD images use the old
> kernel code, is there a
> > rough timescale for making the changes available?
> >
> > Thanks for your time,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
>
> --
> Irish Free Software Forum:
> http://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-ie
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Reply to: