Re: A problem I can't solve
"M.C. Vernon" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Well, it would seem heretical to infect a Hurd-specific part of glibc
> > with the string "/usr", unless perhaps we have vendor=debian. I vote
> > for /usr/lib -> /lib and crossing our fingers.
> Heresy is often a good thing. I would rather have glibc that will make
> things work without any more symlinks, rather than have /lib -> /usr/lib
> as a hack, which may produce bugs later.
I'm not sure what significance the following has for debian-hurd, but
it can't hurt my argument :) so I'll mention it: Solaris has /lib as
a symlink to ./usr/lib .