Re: Problems getting the .debs :(
Hi!
>>>>> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
MB> The 106-0.3 should be in the archive, or they were delayed or
MB> rejected.
Rejected... because the installers won't accept new binary packages
without source (which is a good policy), and for a braino of mine in
changing /usr/doc to /doc.
MB> 109? Hey, I missed it! Gordon has done some work, it seems.
For a change. ;)
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
[Unfortunately, www.fig.org is broken. Please stay tuned for details.]
Reply to: