Re: libc6_2.0.106-0.1_i386.deb is released
>>>>> Santiago Vila writes:
SV> Please, do not upload them to the main archives untile they have
SV> proper names, compatible with the earlier ones: glibc2,
SV> glibc2-dev and such.
... but the whole point of this particular libc package is that it is
backwards compatible with the existing Debian GNU/Linux pre-2.1
packages. This will allow us to merge our changes into Dale Scheetz's
official pre-2.1 package when it comes out, rather than maintaining a
separate glibc package.
Wouldn't the right thing be to add a ``Replaces: glibc2'' line to my
package, rather than making the package names inconsistent with the
I'm sure there are other issues, too...
Gordon Matzigkeit <email@example.com> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
[Unfortunately, www.fig.org is broken. Please stay tuned for details.]