[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kde4libs vs qt4

Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2008, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Sune Vuorela <Sune@vuorela.dk> wrote:
Paer.debian.org is currently locked down, so there is not much I can do
about it myself.
Just for the records, your access to the ESIEE cluster is just a
matter of sending me a non-compromised ssh key ;)


I now hacked a bit and got stuff working on one of those cluster machines.

This isn't the "real solution" though.

Qt4 has arch specific code for most archs (and a "generic" arch mostly used for bootstrapping of Qt), but no arch for linux/hppa, so we use the "generic" arch here.

The real solution involves some hppa assembler (which is way out of my league). There is a patch in the package by lamont about patching the hpux code, but I couldn't get taht to work with my quick tests.

To be inspired on what is needed, looking at other archs could be a inspiration:
qt4-x11-4.4.0$ find . | grep s390

qt4-x11-4.4.0$ find . | grep parisc

Maybe it would be possible to use gcc's atomic builtin functions ?

Haven't looked into it yet, but will do.


Reply to: