[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problem during the reboot phase (netinst mage 2004-05-16)



Hello Stex,

SteX wrote:

On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 01:19:41PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote:
Hi Joel,
well I found the solution!
Partition Start(MB) End(MB) Id Type
1               1      33   f0 Palo
2              34     157   83 ext2
5             158     818   83 ext2
6             819    1910   83 ext2
7            1911    2005   82 swap

PALO(F0) partition contains:
 0/vmlinux64 6666431 bytes @ 0x48000

Excuse me but I don't have enough time experiment new d-i (so I have no
clue of default partitioning), but I recently work on palo-1.5 and it
seems that in fact palo don't find '/boot/vmlinux'; it could be because:
  - it is not install at all
  - it doesn't stand at the expected place (ie into /boot).

In the first case just reboot in interactive mode and choose to boot on
'0/vmlinux64' and try to re-install the kernel you want.
Here it is! to change the boot command in order to make the system boot
from PALO partition and not from /boot/...
So the final string (interact with IPL) must be

0/vmlinux64 root=/dev/md2 HOME=/ console=ttyS0 TERM=vt100
Yes '0/vmlinux64' is what is called 'recovery kernel' in palo.conf and stand in 'PALO' partition (specific to parisc linux). Now that you reach to boot it would be nice that you have a look in /boot where you would find the usual kernel vmlinux (and also where you would put other testing kernel before 'production'). And 'df -k' would also shows a 'boot' fs like:
/dev/sda2                123699     66119     51193  57% /boot
/dev/sda5               1692128   1209236    396936  76% /

(size came from my own system) and I put in my /etc/palo.conf something like:
--commandline=2/vmlinux root=/dev/sda5 HOME=/ TERM=vt100
--init-partitioned=/dev/sda

(check carefully that sda2 is well your /boot and sda5 your / (ie your root partition); I just append TERM for you) and just re-run palo (without parameter it will take /etc/palo.conf as default in which you say which disk to use: sda).

That said, palo is a bit like grub, it doesn't need to be run each time you want to use or test a new kernel (like required lilo): just put it in your /boot with another name like vmlinux-2.6.6-pa3, interupt the boot and just change the boot cmd with 2/vmlinux-2.6.6-pa3 and b ;-) Just re-run palo to put in place a new palo, a new kernel that you fill enough tested and robust for you.

the vt102 terminal get my console *dirty* of character, therefore I prefer
vt100 with seem a little bit *cleaner*.
In the syslog of the installer i found:
root=/dev/ram init=/linuxrc console=ttyS0 TERM=vt100 palo_kernel=0/vmlinux64

Well depends of your actual terminal with hp terminal emulating vt200 and a terminal emulation like minicom vt200 works fine for me.

Unfortunately I found:
May 16 11:51:20 (none) syslog.warn klogd: iosapic: hpa not registered for
Hewlett-Packard Company Visualize FX4
...
May 16 11:51:20 (none) syslog.warn klogd: stifb: Unsupported gfx card id
0x2fc1066b

Yes, it's a know issue: it seems to be a licence pb :_(
But Grant seems to confident to obtain something :-)
But there are reports of succesfull use of some pci aty and voodoo2 gfx card. (have a look in this ml or in the parisc-linux ml) For my part I was luckyless: I try an aty but it was a card for a sun and its initialisation is different then a pc model :_(

It is a pity that the graph card is not supported. However i found a
document, in the hp site if I remember well, about how to recompile OpenGL
drivers for hp workstation. Do you know if it is possible also under
debian?
Well, I hack a bit this stuff and reach to re-compile the Xhp server but I nerver reach to find how to implement /dev/crt0 ;) But that was only (not applicable for FX4) in the hope to improve the color dep of gfx encounter on 712, c110 or b180. And even if I work much more on this stuff, it will not help a lot because it would also required to change app libs to use actually more colors.

Unfortunately the only reasonable hope is Grant .

Regards,
   Joel



Reply to: