Re: kernel building problems: low-latency and pre-emptive patches
> It's a big job; more so for preempt than lowlat. But why not try 2.6?
> It's already got most of the lowlat stuff integrated and preempt needs
> someone to fix it in 2.6 too ;-)
if someone wants to fix this,
http://ftp.parisc-linux.org/patches/diff-2.6.0-test1-preempt
may provide a starting point, but it's missing some important pieces.
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
Reply to: