Thanks for all the possibilities. I am running a 233MHz AMD K6 PC, Debian. I'm not sure what the problem was, but I tried it once again last night and it was working perfectly. Go figure. Perhaps I had a screen session open in the background that was interfering, or maybe I had a heavy load on my system and it was the interrupt thing. It worked in both minicom and screen, BTW. screen /dev/ttyS1 9600,ixoff and minicom with the 9600 8N1 settings, no hardware or software control. Thanks! Hans :) On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 02:03:52AM -0700, Christian Suder cried: > Richard Hirst wrote: > > > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:31:18AM -0700, Christian Suder wrote: > > > Richard Hirst wrote: > > > > What are you running minicom on? If it's a 386 using an old UART with no > > > > FIFO then I'd suggest it just couldn't cope with bursts of data at 9.6K. > > > > Not very likely though. When you type things at the BOOT_ADMIN prompt > > > > is it all echoed back properly? > > > > > > No, the UART is certainly not a problem at 9600 bit/s. > > > > Well, if whatever is servicing the UART chooses to disable interrupts > > for several milliseconds at a time, then you could get this effect. > > True, that is the theory - my empirical answer is that I have never seen any > issues running 9600 bit/s even on a windooze machine. I certainly was using > 14.4k modems with 19200 bit./s setting on the serial port years ago with both > M$oft and linux (when it came on a stack of 5 1/4" diskettes... ;-) > > C, > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org -- YAAH! DEATH TO OATMEAL! -- Calvin
Attachment:
pgpj4e0EXHowy.pgp
Description: PGP signature