Re: binary only NMUs

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On 25 May 2001, James Troup wrote:

> Hi,

Hi James,

> As of today katie now does fascist source-must-exist checking and you
> guys are the first to get bitten by it! :->
>
> Please follow the bin-only NMU versioning scheme laid out in the
> developers reference so your packages can be processed, i.e. foo_2.3-4
> becomes foo_2.3-4.0.1 etc.
>...

Not to forget:

foo_2.3 becomes foo_2.3-0.0.1

(the developers reference says that foo_2.3-0.1 would be the version
number for a source NMU)

cu
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi