Re: Status of libpsm2
>>>>> "B" == Brian Smith <bsmith@systemfabricworks.com> writes:
B> Hi Roland, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:42 AM, "R" == Roland Fehrenbacher
B> <rfehren@debian.org> wrote:
R> As Mehdi mentioned, 40-psm.rules is no more necessary, since the
R> hfi1 module sets the dev permissions correctly already.
R> Concerning 40-psm-compat.rules, I just added a linitian override
R> to fix this. IMO appstream metadata is not useful in a HPC
R> cluster. If people disagree, this can be fixed later as well.
B> I had found that to be the case with 40-psm.rules, as well. I've
B> fixed things like that in the past and was told the proper
B> procedure is to ask upstream to fix it. I will take a look at
B> their current code and file a bug if they are still installing
B> that rule. But, I'm also leaving in the work you did. Thanks for
B> the help.
Sure you can file a bug with upstream about this. But since I merely
took out 40-psm.rules from libpsm2-2.install, it doesn't matter for the
debian package at all, whether upstream "installs" the file or not.
Reply to: