[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GHC 8.0.2



Hello Joachim

>that is true for the the three packages affected according to Ilias
>(and any missed packages). The others just need a binNMU.
I had to bump:
haskell-cabal from 1.24.1.0 to 1.24.2.0

haskell-dependent-sum from 0.3.2.2 to 0.4 to fix a FTBFS

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-dependent-sum/0.3.2.2-3build1


I don't want to upload the latter, because I'm not sure if 0.4 will break reverse-dependencies,
according to hackage:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/dependent-sum-0.4

Debian:0.2.1.0, LTSHaskell:0.3.2.2, NixOS:0.4, Stackage:0.4, Tumbleweed:0.3.2.2

so, aren't we following LTSHaskell? How can the package build with ghc 8.0.2
it  is used by 15 packages, I don't want to propagate a bad new release to next levels.

Please ack/nack my changes :)

G.


Reply to: