[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
To
:
debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From
: Simon Michael <
simon@joyful.com
>
Date
: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:04:35 -0700
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
nuiqin$6qo$1@blaine.gmane.org
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
20161023150032.GB4066@scru.org
>
References
: <20160908183205.f36a2830d6dbed7c36b80252@brisammon.fastmail.fm> <20160908232348.GA5304@scru.org> <
[🔎]
1475677645.13679.5.camel@debian.org
> <
[🔎]
20161007193426.GA7250@scru.org
> <
[🔎]
20161022190040.nhveagilmktvut5d@teal.hq.k1024.org
> <
[🔎]
20161022212728.GB29537@scru.org
> <
[🔎]
20161022234403.hqrbz4jwzuj5jajf@teal.hq.k1024.org
> <
[🔎]
20161023150032.GB4066@scru.org
>
Thanks for working on this.
I am close to releasing hledger[-*] 0.28, which should help with a lot
of dependency issues. If necessary, I can do it today ?
Reply to:
debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Simon Michael (on-list)
Simon Michael (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
References
:
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Iustin Pop <iustin@debian.org>
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Iustin Pop <iustin@debian.org>
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
From:
Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
Next by Date:
Bug#841857: RFS: keysafe/0.20161022-1 [ITP]
Previous by thread:
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
Next by thread:
Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
Index(es):
Date
Thread