Re: vcswatch and DHG_packages/shared repos
On 2016-05-24 22:41:55, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-05-24 18:24:29, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:23AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, den 24.05.2016, 00:18 +0200 schrieb Iustin Pop:
> > > > While we have other tools to check consistency, this inconsistency (and
> > > > the associated vcwatch errors) still bother me. Did anyone open a bug or
> > > > discussion somewhere (e.g. -devel) about extending Vcs-* to support
> > > > shared repositories (e.g. with custom subdirs for the package instead of
> > > > hardcoded `/')?
> > >
> > > no, nobody has yet started to scratch that itch. If you want to, please
> > > do!
>
> Will do!
>
> > I couldn't find anything related, neither on the mailing lists nor the
> > bug reports. Then again, I am not aware of any other team that maintains
> > their packages under one repo, so maybe that explains why nobody has
> > requested such a feature yet.
>
> Interesting, I thought I remembered at least some other team doing this,
> maybe I'm wrong.
>
> > The Vcs-Git field can optionally specify the branch to be used in the
> > indicated repository[1]. Maybe it can be extended to also specify the
> > subdirectory where the 'debian/changelog' is located, though this may
> > require changing the Debian policy.
>
> Yes, that's the plan.
>
> > If you would like, I can open a bug report against vcswatch, and see
> > were it goes from there.
>
> A bug against vcswatch is, IMHO, potentially not the best place to do
> it. I was planning to send an email to -devel to see if anybody has
> strong feelings one way or another, and wanted to check first if anybody
> did it.
OK, email sent. I didn't CC this list since I'm not a fan of
cross-posting, feel free to followup on -devel.
thanks!
iustin
Reply to: