[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging Haskell applications



Hello,

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:49:56PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> it depends. What fraction of the maintenance work will be Haskell-
> packaging related?
> 
> If it is a package with many non-Haskell users that will file bugs that
> need to be reproduced and narrowed down, with knowledge of the
> particular application, then the non-Haskell-related workload is high,
> and it makes sense for you to maintain them yourself. Of course we are
> around to help.
> 
> If it is a low maintenance package and most time will be spend updating
> the build-depends as new versions come out, it could live under the DHG
> umbrella. Also, if it becomes a build-dependency of “our” packages.
> 
> But generally, I suggest the former: Individual maintainers who feel
> responsible and are responsive.

Thanks for the feedback.  I'll make a judgment about each package when I
come to package them.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: