Hello, On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:49:56PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > it depends. What fraction of the maintenance work will be Haskell- > packaging related? > > If it is a package with many non-Haskell users that will file bugs that > need to be reproduced and narrowed down, with knowledge of the > particular application, then the non-Haskell-related workload is high, > and it makes sense for you to maintain them yourself. Of course we are > around to help. > > If it is a low maintenance package and most time will be spend updating > the build-depends as new versions come out, it could live under the DHG > umbrella. Also, if it becomes a build-dependency of “our” packages. > > But generally, I suggest the former: Individual maintainers who feel > responsible and are responsive. Thanks for the feedback. I'll make a judgment about each package when I come to package them. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature