Hi,
Am Freitag, den 09.05.2014, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
> I don't see any problem with just taking the template file.
> I thought, since other guides say so, I should make a machine parsable
> copyright file, but I will stick with the template.
> Should we maybe consider updating our template to a parsable format?
it isn’t? It should be... Feel free to improve the template in any way
sou think it ought to be improved.
Just making sure: We are both talking about
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-haskell/tools.git;a=tree;f=template-debian
right?
> > (If you agree, please also change the copyright file in setlocale
> > accordingly.)
>
> Setlocale is public domain. So I guess we could distribute it under a
> BSD-3 license, but should we really do that?
In that case I’d would have suggested something like
Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: haskell-setlocale
Source: hackage.haskell.org/package/setlocale
Files: *
License: Public Domain
The author of this package, Lukas Mai, placed this package in
the
Public Domain.
Files: debian/*
License: Public Domain
The maintainer of this package, Sven Bartscher, placed this
packaging in the Public Domain.
but honestly, I don’t care too much.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part