[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lambdabot unbuildable



Hi,

Am Samstag, den 22.06.2013, 09:23 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:28:29PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I haven’t touched the package besides updating the list of dependencies
> > (and then noticing that there are a lot new packages),
> 
> Indeed.  Anyone fancy packaging some of these?  I don't think I have
> time.
> 
>   dependent-map
>   dependent-sum
>   dependent-sum-template
>   dice
>   hstatsd
>   misfortune
>   mueval
>   random-fu
>   random-source

the list is actually longer, due to dependencies of dependencies:

continued-fractions-0.9.1.1
converge-0.1.0.1
dependent-sum-0.2.0.1
dependent-map-0.1.1.1
gamma-0.9.0.2
hstatsd-0.1
stateref-0.3
th-extras-0.0.0.2
dependent-sum-template-0.0.0.1
flexible-defaults-0.0.1.1
random-source-0.3.0.4
rvar-0.2.0.1
random-fu-0.2.4.0
dice-0.1
misfortune-0.1.1.1
mueval-0.9


It is too bad that lambdabot does not suppot enabling dependencies by
flags. James, would you think you could make lambdabot more
configurable?

For example, I’m not sure if a Debian-local installation of labmdabot
needs the misfortune feature, and the misfortune packages comes with
data of unclear copyright (e.g.
https://github.com/mokus0/misfortune/blob/master/data/normal/bash). But
then, there is already forutnes-mod in Debian, so it might be ok. 

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: