Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2011, 19:41 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > Thank you for the information. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo > <mle+hs@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > > GHCi has never worked on s390 and is currently broken on > > powerpc (see bug #631073). > > Can I set debian/control file's architecture line, below? > <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Platforms> > > --------------------------- > Package: ghc-mod > Architecture: amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 powerpc sparc > --------------------------- > > Or, should I remove powerpc from architecture line? > Because powerpc's ghci has the problem, now. just depend on the virtual package "ghc-ghci" and your package will only be attempted to be built on architectures where GHCi is available. If it has previously built on other architectures, the packages on these arches need to be removed. For that, file a bug against ftp.debian.org (best by using "reportbug ftp.debian.org" and following the instruction). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part