On 26/07/2011 01:10, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > great, thanks! > > Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 01:05 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: >> Please, let me know your opinions and comments about my patches. > > It seems to me that this is not necessary restricted to data packages > shipped with the current source, but rather any dependency that should > be added to any program using the code. This could be a binary that the > program calls, a service such as a dbus or anything else. Hence maybe > you want to rename DEB_GHC_DATA_PACKAGES to DEB_GHC_EXTRA_DEPENDENCIES > or DEB_GHC_RUNTIME_DEPS and also the files created by the patches. > > (I only skimmed the patches though, it is too late already). Just to know: you prefer to see the patches more accurately, or it's ok if I upload the updated packages? Thanks, Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature