Hi, great, thanks! Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 01:05 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Please, let me know your opinions and comments about my patches. It seems to me that this is not necessary restricted to data packages shipped with the current source, but rather any dependency that should be added to any program using the code. This could be a binary that the program calls, a service such as a dbus or anything else. Hence maybe you want to rename DEB_GHC_DATA_PACKAGES to DEB_GHC_EXTRA_DEPENDENCIES or DEB_GHC_RUNTIME_DEPS and also the files created by the patches. (I only skimmed the patches though, it is too late already). > Unfortunately haskell-devscripts code is sometimes a bit complicated. I > tried to do as least changes as possible and keep the same style of the > existing code. I would not mind a rewrite of haskell-devscripts, mabye in something slightly safer and more reliable than bash (thinking perl here, to avoid circular dependencies with ghc). But I won’t have the time any time soon. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part