On Wednesday, 25. May 2011. 9.49.34 Joachim Breitner wrote: > we prefer to treat all haskell packages equally, e.g. having their > debian directory in the Darcs repo unter the pkg-haskell alioth project. > Have you considered joining the Debian Haskell Group to maintain > haskell-qt? And do you plan to package more Haskell libraries? And what > exactly do you need haskell-qt for, e.g. what package depends on it? Surely I would maintain haskell-qt (or qtHaskell as it is originally called), and I would be glad to join the Debian Haskell Group. As for more libraries, I could package some more, but I didn't plan to for now. I am not aware of packages that depend on qthaskell. Generally, I packaged qthaskell because I like qt and like haskell. :) > And why is haskell-qt not on hackage? I really have no idea. Possibly because it cannot be built only with cabal, one must first build the c-bits subpackage with qmake&&make and then the remainder of the package using cabal. -- Filip Brcic <email@example.com> WWWeb: http://brcha.com Jabber : firstname.lastname@example.org GPG 0x2537C379 Fingerprint: 287D 5F24 50AA A36C 977F AC9A F1FD C7EB 2537 C379
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.